华硕 VivoBook 18 笔记本电脑评测：不到 1,000 美元的显示屏怪物有待改进。 随着 VivoBook 18 的发布，华硕将自己定位在了 18 英寸笔记本电脑的利基市场，但与竞争对手不同的是，它没有配备 dGPU。您可以在我们的评测中了解这一概念是否可行。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/27/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 AMD Laptop / Notebook Radeon Zen 4
结论 - 市场空白，但仍有改进空间在此之前，不配备专用显卡的经济实惠型 18 英寸笔记本电脑一直非常罕见。因此，搭载 Ryzen 7 260 和 Radeon 780M iGPU 的 VivoBook 18 M1807HA 确实具有独特的卖点，但遗憾的是，华硕并没有充分挖掘其潜力。首先是它的外壳，质量可以更高、更稳定，尤其是在触摸板方面。相对于可用空间而言，它的键盘相当小（没有标准数字键盘），这也是一个遗憾。此外，华硕还应该在笔记本的散热上下功夫，因为尽管其 GPU 性能低于平均水平，但 18 英寸设备在负载情况下（至少从性能模式开始）噪音还是相当大。除了第二个风扇外，机箱内还应该有空间安装第二个 M.2 或内存插槽（现有的 16 GB 内存是焊接上去的）。由于 18 英寸机身没有 USB 4 接口，其部分过时的连接功能进一步降低了评分。
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
在所有其他类别中，VivoBook 18 的表现都相当出色。例如，我们对其 CPU 速度、图像质量和电池续航时间几乎没有什么可抱怨的。总的来说，我们只建议那些绝对需要一款 18 英寸设备且价格不高的用户购买。
Pros+ 经济实惠的 18 英寸笔记本电脑
+ 纤薄的显示屏边框
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 网络摄像头快门Cons- 内存是焊接上去的
- 声音会很大
- 触摸板不稳定
- 只有一个 M.2 插槽
- 无 USB 4
价格和供应情况VivoBook 18 M1807HA 尚未在美国发售。它的最高售价估计略低于 1,000 美元。
$1,099.99ASUS Vivobook 18 Laptop, 18” WUXGA 144Hz Display, AMD Ryzen 7 260 with XDNA NPU, AMD Radeon Graphics, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Quiet Blue, M1807HA-DB79$7.59Keyboard Cover Skin for ASUS Vivobook 15 M5506 S5506 S5507 S5507QA 15.6, VivoBook 18 M1807 M1807HA 18", VivoBook 16 M1607KA M5606 S5606 X1607QA/Vivobook V16 V3607VU V3607VJ 16 inch Laptop -OmbreMint$7.592PCS Keyboard Cover for ASUS Vivobook 15 M5506 S5506 S5507 S5507QA 15.6'', VivoBook 18 M1807 M1807HA 18", VivoBook 16 M1607KA M5606 S5606 X1607QA/Vivobook V16 V3607VU V3607VJ 16''
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents结论 - 市场空白，但仍有改进空间规格案例连接性输入设备显示屏性能排放量电源管理Notebookcheck 总评分Possible alternatives compared
规格
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 260 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Graphics adapterAMD Radeon 780M - 512 MB VRAM, DDR5, Adrenalin 25.3.1Memory16 GB , soldered, one SO-DIMM slot (empty)Display18.40 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 123 PPI, BOE NE180WUM-NY3, IPS, glossy: no, 144 HzMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, 512 GB , NVMe-SSD, one M.2 2280 slot (in use)Soundcard Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K19.7 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combined (Headset/Mic)NetworkingRealtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 403 x 275Battery70 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 CellsOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: Full-HDPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65 W Power Supply (USB C), MyAsus, 24 Months WarrantyWeight2.63 kg, Power Supply: 226 g
Price800 EURLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
案例制造商采用了塑料外壳。正如我们从许多笔记本电脑中了解到的那样，深灰色的表面很容易留下指纹痕迹。VivoBook 18 的高度约为 20 毫米（不含脚垫），既不算厚也不算薄。约 2.6 千克的重量对于 18 英寸笔记本电脑来说也还可以接受。它的一大亮点是 180° 的大开合角度，尽管铰链感觉有些微妙。总体而言，它的制造质量很高。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 DIN A4 ❌
连接性VivoBook 18 只能使用四个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口，不过它的两个 Type-C 端口支持 PowerDelivery 和 DisplayPort。它还配有一个音频插孔和一个 HDMI 2.0 输出。没有 LAN 端口或读卡器。
在我们的测试中，集成无线模块（Realtek RTL8852BE）的 Wi-Fi 速度只能算一般。
该笔记本的全高清网络摄像头配有机械盖，清晰度很高，但色彩还不够准确。
左侧
右侧
交流
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel BE201 320MHz
1652 (850min - 1713max) MBit/s +107%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
1613 (800min - 1663max) MBit/s +102%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1608 (1424min - 1752max) MBit/s +101%Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=78, last 2 years)
1107 MBit/s +38%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARealtek RTL8852BE
800 (414min - 845max) MBit/s Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 926, n=59)
791 MBit/s -1%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
537 (404min - 674max) MBit/s -33% iperf3 receive AXE11000Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel BE201 320MHz
1755 (1742min - 1771max) MBit/s +89%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
1753 (1729min - 1767max) MBit/s +89%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1551 (1450min - 1626max) MBit/s +67%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1443 (1217min - 1552max) MBit/s +55%Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=79, last 2 years)
1287 MBit/s +39%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARealtek RTL8852BE
928 (726min - 976max) MBit/s Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 985, n=60)
858 MBit/s -8%
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (414-845) HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1608 (1424-1752) Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø537 (404-674) MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1587 (800-1663) Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1652 (850-1713) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (726-976) HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1450-1626) Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1442 (1217-1552) MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1752 (1729-1767) Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1742-1771)
网络摄像头
17.7 ∆E14.1 ∆E21 ∆E18 ∆E18.7 ∆E17.1 ∆E15 ∆E29.6 ∆E18.8 ∆E20.6 ∆E8.6 ∆E9.6 ∆E21.8 ∆E14.8 ∆E21 ∆E4.9 ∆E20.4 ∆E20.2 ∆E2.3 ∆E12.9 ∆E14.9 ∆E18.3 ∆E16.5 ∆E7.3 ∆EColorChecker Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA: 16 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 29.55 ∆E
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA
输入设备我们对其键盘的设计了解有限。尽管笔记本的外壳很宽，但华硕只安装了三列而不是四列数字键盘，方向箭头也非常小。我们对键盘的键入手感和白色背光（3 级）没有太多批评。
与键盘相比，该设备的触摸板比一般键盘要大。不到 15 x 10 厘米的尺寸创下了笔记本电脑的记录，但正如开头提到的，它的稳定性还有待提高。得益于光滑的表面，手指在触摸板上的滑动相当顺畅。制造商可以改进一下不稳定的点击区域。
显示屏除了不同寻常的尺寸外，华硕还采用了相对不够出色的 IPS 面板。对于一款 18 英寸的设备来说，1920 x 1200 像素（16:10 长宽比）的显示屏已经达到了极限；我们希望看到至少 2560 x 1600 像素的显示屏。不过，在我们的测试中，显示屏没有出现任何明显的错误。略低于 100% sRGB 的覆盖率与 1375:1 的对比度一样适合笔记本电脑的价格。324 cd/m² 左右的亮度足以应付大多数室内环境，但在室外使用时则需要更高的亮度。在交付状态下，面板有轻微的偏蓝现象，但可以通过校准来纠正。其响应时间在典型的 IPS 范围内。我们没有发现图像闪烁现象。
334cd/m²330cd/m²314cd/m²329cd/m²330cd/m²299cd/m²337cd/m²329cd/m²310cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessBOE NE180WUM-NY3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 337 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 323.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²Contrast: 1375:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.34 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 1.03ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)97.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.112CCT: 6875 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HABOE NE180WUM-NY3, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.4", 144 HzHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrSamsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USamsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 HzMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AUO28B2 (B160QAN02.N), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 HzSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzDisplay30%32%21%30% Display P3 Coverage (%)66.999.6 49%99.9 49%94.6 41%99.9 49% sRGB Coverage (%)97.7100 2%100 2%99.7 2%100 2% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)68.896.5 40%100 45%83.4 21%96.6 40%Response Times93%93%20%95% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)13.8 ?(6.7, 7.1)0.8 ?(0.45, 0.35) 94%0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29) 96%5.6 ?(1.8, 3.8) 59%0.48 ?(0.26, 0.22) 97% Response Time Black / White * (ms)9.4 ?(5, 4.4)0.89 ?(0.42, 0.47) 91%1 ?(0.55, 0.45) 89%11.2 ?(5.8, 5.4) -19%0.64 ?(0.37, 0.27) 93% PWM Frequency (Hz)491.8 ?(100)238.8240 ?(100) PWM Amplitude * (%)40Screen9%9%-6%39%Brightness middle (cd/m²)330399.4 21%379.8 15%488 48%387 17%Brightness (cd/m²)324405 25%383 18%444 37%392 21%Brightness Distribution (%)8998 10%98 10%86 -3%98 10%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.240.36 -50%Contrast (:1)13751356 -1%Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.344.05 -73%4.7 -101%3.45 -47%1 57%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *6.946.69 4%7.51 -8%6.77 2%1.9 73%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.031.02 1%0.55 47%1.35 -31%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.91.1 72%0.8 79%4.16 -7%1.7 56%Gamma2.112 104%2.27 97%2.22 99%2.52 87%2.25 98%CCT6875 95%6419 101%6381 102%6832 95%6325 103%Total Average (Program / Settings)44% /
28%45% /
28%12% /
4%55% /
47%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼：灰度
CalMAN：色彩饱和度
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN：灰度（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩校验器（已校准）华硕 VivoBook 18 对比 sRGB
华硕 VivoBook 18 对比 AdobeRGB
华硕 VivoBook 18 对比 DCI-P3日光
子像素
视角
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise↘ 4.4 ms fallThe screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.7 ms rise↘ 7.1 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8255 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
亮度为 100
亮度 75
50 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
0 % 亮度性能在我们的测试中，CPU 性能处于中端水平，而 GPU 性能却只处于入门级水平。16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘对于其不到 1,000 美元的价格来说还算不错，但并没有什么值得称道的地方。
测试条件MyAsus 软件包含四种运行模式，主要在噪音开发和处理器 TDP 方面有所不同（见表）。图形功耗方面的偏差非常有限。我们的测量是在性能模式下进行的。
华硕模式
低声模式
标准
性能
全速
赛博朋克 2077 噪音
34 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清）
13.2fps
13.5fps
13.6fps
13.7fps
Cinebench R15 Multi Score
2002 分
2358 分
2523 分
2539 分
CPU PL1
27 瓦
40 瓦
54 瓦
54 瓦
CPU PL2
32 瓦
50 瓦
60 瓦
60 瓦
处理器......（英文 Ryzen 7 260Ryzen 7 260 是 Zen 4 代（4 纳米）的八核机型，我们之前未对其进行过测试，它可通过 SMT 处理多达 16 个并行线程，并拥有 16 MB 三级缓存。在基准测试过程中，这款笔记本电脑的 CPU 表现相当出色，几乎可以媲美 Ryzen AI 9 365(微星 Prestige A16）不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2498 (2440.07-2563.94) HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1951 (1885.73-2044.68) Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51) MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø2688 (2563.28-2772.58) Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V: Ø1447 (1432.05-1482.96)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5 CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
84.4 pt Average AMD Ryzen 7 260
80.8 pt Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
76.5 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
70.2 pt Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
70.1 pt Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
61.6 pt Average of class Office
57.4 pt Cinebench R23
Multi CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
18069 Points +14%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (15864 - 17712, n=2)
16788 Points +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
15864 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
13082 (12624.7min - 13082.1max) Points -18%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12032 (9372.55min - 12032.4max) Points -24%Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=83, last 2 years)
10399 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
9827 Points -38% Single CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
1992 Points +13%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1760 - 1801, n=2)
1781 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
1760 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
1749 Points -1%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1745 Points -1%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1719 Points -2%Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=83, last 2 years)
1605 Points -9%Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
7057 Points +15%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6161 - 6969, n=2)
6565 Points +7%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
6161 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
4994 Points -19%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4740 Points -23%Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=81, last 2 years)
4086 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
3835 Points -38% CPU (Single Core)MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
785 Points +14%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (690 - 697, n=2)
694 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
690 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
674 Points -2%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
668 Points -3%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
649 Points -6%Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=81, last 2 years)
630 Points -9%Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64BitMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2773 (2563.28min - 2772.58max) Points +8%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2564 - 2831, n=2)
2698 Points +5%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
2564 (2440.07min - 2563.94max) Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2045 (1885.73min - 2044.68max) Points -20%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1986 (1515.15min - 1985.51max) Points -23%Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=85, last 2 years)
1705 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
1483 (1432.05min - 1482.96max) Points -42% CPU Single 64BitMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
305 Points +10%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (278 - 283, n=2)
281 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
278 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
270 Points -3%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
268 Points -4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
261 Points -6%Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=83, last 2 years)
243 Points -13%Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=84, last 2 years)
384 Seconds * -88%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
348 Seconds * -71%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -30%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
246 Seconds * -21%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
204 Seconds * MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
203 Seconds * -0%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (183 - 204, n=2)
193.5 Seconds * +5%7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (63076 - 72888, n=2)
67982 MIPS +8%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
63076 MIPS MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
60226 MIPS -5%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
54768 MIPS -13%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
54022 MIPS -14%Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=85, last 2 years)
41793 MIPS -34%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
33110 MIPS -48% 7z b 4 -mmt1Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6439 - 6497, n=2)
6468 MIPS 0%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
6439 MIPS MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
6062 MIPS -6%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6041 MIPS -6%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
5912 MIPS -8%Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=84, last 2 years)
5365 MIPS -17%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
5335 MIPS -17%Geekbench 6.4
Multi-CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
14189 Points +39%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (10180 - 13349, n=2)
11765 Points +16%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
11081 Points +9%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10763 Points +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
10180 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
9950 Points -2%Average of class Office (757 - 14998, n=93, last 2 years)
9228 Points -9% Single-CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2830 Points +8%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2622 - 2683, n=2)
2653 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
2622 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
2582 Points -2%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2562 Points -2%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2525 Points -4%Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=93, last 2 years)
2280 Points -13%Geekbench 5.5
Multi-CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
12660 Points +29%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (9848 - 12597, n=2)
11223 Points +14%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
9949 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
9848 Points Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9516 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
8963 Points -9%Average of class Office (1532 - 14192, n=83, last 2 years)
8274 Points -16% Single-CoreMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2066 Points +6%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1948 - 1986, n=2)
1967 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
1948 Points Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1933 Points -1%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1894 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
1878 Points -4%Average of class Office (510 - 2128, n=84, last 2 years)
1688 Points -13%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (17.6 - 22.4, n=2)
20 fps +14%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
19.5 fps +11%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
17.6 fps HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
15.7 fps -11%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.4 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
12.7 fps -28%Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=82, last 2 years)
11.7 fps -34%LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
59.5 s * -9%Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=82, last 2 years)
56 s * -3%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
54.5 s * Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (49.6 - 54.5, n=2)
52.1 s * +4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
51.7 s * +5%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
45.2 s * +17%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
43.4 s * +20%R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=81, last 2 years)
0.537 sec * -20%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
0.4808 sec * -8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
0.4638 sec * -4%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4593 sec * -3%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260
0.4465 sec * Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (0.4454 - 0.4465, n=2)
0.446 sec * -0%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
0.4142 sec * +7%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit7384
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit45689
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit3.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit30.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2564 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit132.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit278 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)690 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6161 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core15864 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1760 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core104 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core786 Points
Help... in comparisonCinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparisonAsus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min)
N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs91 ...SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU779Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M781Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M785Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA
R7 260, Radeon 780M786Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, 786Maingear ML-16 MK2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU789Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M790 ...
(max)
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation5372
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
93.9 pt Average AMD Ryzen 7 260
93.6 pt Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
89.1 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
75.8 pt Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68.5 pt Average of class Office
52.1 pt Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
49.8 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
28614 KRay/s +10%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (25995 - 29330, n=2)
27663 KRay/s +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
25995 KRay/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
20007 KRay/s -23%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
17924 KRay/s -31%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
12147 KRay/s -53%Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=83, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s -54%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (106250 - 121427, n=2)
113839 Points +7%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
108501 Points +2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
106250 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
84591 Points -20%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78360 Points -26%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
60119 Points -43%Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=83, last 2 years)
55776 Points -48%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (4682 - 4980, n=2)
4831 MB/s +3%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
4682 MB/s MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
4676 MB/s 0%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
3847 MB/s -18%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3519 MB/s -25%Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=83, last 2 years)
2647 MB/s -43%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
2551 MB/s -46%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (115108 - 123832, n=2)
119470 Points +4%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
115108 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
107640 Points -6%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
96417 Points -16%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
87502 Points -24%Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=83, last 2 years)
69096 Points -40%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
46991 Points -59%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
15987 Points +8%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (14810 - 15328, n=2)
15069 Points +2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
14810 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
12929 Points -13%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12063 Points -19%Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=83, last 2 years)
7360 Points -50%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
3918 Points -74%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (56974 - 65308, n=2)
61141 Points +7%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
57916 Points +2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
56974 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
44969 Points -21%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
40720 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
32239 Points -43%Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=83, last 2 years)
29253 Points -49%AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
84965 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (68595 - 84965, n=2)
76780 MB/s -10%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
70892 MB/s -17%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
67856 MB/s -20%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
54432 MB/s -36%Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=83, last 2 years)
51565 MB/s -39%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
34238 MB/s -60%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
1159 MB/s +10%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1053 - 1131, n=2)
1092 MB/s +4%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
1053 MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
857 MB/s -19%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
822 MB/s -22%Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=83, last 2 years)
678 MB/s -36%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
571 MB/s -46%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
15341 KRay/s +10%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (13944 - 15751, n=2)
14848 KRay/s +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
13944 KRay/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
10571 KRay/s -24%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9347 KRay/s -33%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
6673 KRay/s -52%Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=83, last 2 years)
6261 KRay/s -55%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
50096 MPixel/s +117%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
49843 MPixel/s +116%Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=83, last 2 years)
32366 MPixel/s +40%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (23097 - 40796, n=2)
31947 MPixel/s +38%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
31491 MPixel/s +36%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
31055 MPixel/s +34%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
23097 MPixel/s
系统性能尽管 VivoBook 18 的系统性能在对比设备中仅处于中游水平，但这款笔记本电脑的系统性能也不差。在我们的测试中，其工作内存的迟缓变得十分明显。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
7596 Points +12%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
6958 Points +2%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6952 Points +2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
6810 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
6810 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
6672 Points -2%Average of class Office (2823 - 7626, n=72, last 2 years)
6085 Points -11%PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
11027 Points +6%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10816 Points +4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
10503 Points +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
10419 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
10419 Points 0%Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=72, last 2 years)
10081 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
9995 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
10186 Points +9%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10099 Points +8%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
9933 Points +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
9347 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
9347 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8977 Points -4%Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=72, last 2 years)
8375 Points -10%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
10589 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8983 Points +2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
8803 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
8803 Points 0%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
8763 Points 0%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
8347 Points -5%Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=72, last 2 years)
7367 Points -16%CrossMark / Overall
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1804 Points MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
1742 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1643 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1582 Points Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years)
1438 Points CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1798 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1611 Points MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
1596 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1539 Points Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=82, last 2 years)
1413 Points CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
2073 Points Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1821 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1790 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1740 Points Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=82, last 2 years)
1542 Points CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1775 Points HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1347 Points MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
1345 Points Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1289 Points Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=82, last 2 years)
1242 Points WebXPRT 3 / Overall
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
309 Points +12%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
306 Points +11%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
297 Points +8%Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=78, last 2 years)
277 Points 0%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
276 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
276 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
272 Points -1%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
330 Points +26%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
261 Points Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1)
261 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
259 Points -1%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
250 Points -4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
246 Points -6%Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=80, last 2 years)
231 Points -11%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=87, last 2 years)
639 ms * HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
538 ms * Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
522 ms * Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
510 ms * MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
433 ms * * ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
6810 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
99512 MB/s +177%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
88745 MB/s +147%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
68720 MB/s +91%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68255 MB/s +90%Average of class Office (19927 - 108783, n=84, last 2 years)
56844 MB/s +58%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (35899 - 69413, n=2)
52656 MB/s +47%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
35899 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
97219 MB/s +215%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
83885 MB/s +172%Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=84, last 2 years)
58132 MB/s +88%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50373 MB/s +63%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
50273 MB/s +63%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (30894 - 60748, n=2)
45821 MB/s +48%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
30894 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
106434 MB/s +149%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
95663 MB/s +124%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91257 MB/s +113%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
91050 MB/s +113%Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (42757 - 87114, n=2)
64936 MB/s +52%Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=84, last 2 years)
60504 MB/s +42%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
42757 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
129.8 ns * -41%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
121.8 ns * -32%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
115.9 ns * -26%Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=81, last 2 years)
98.3 ns * -7%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V
94.3 ns * -2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260, Radeon 780M
92.1 ns * Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (91.5 - 92.1, n=2)
91.8 ns * -0%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟与大多数笔记本电脑一样，这款机型的延迟也是一个问题，这可能会导致在执行某些任务时出现一些问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1639.8 μs * -15%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
1429.3 μs * Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
832.4 μs * +42%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
580.3 μs * +59%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
366.6 μs * +74%* ... smaller is better
存储设备如果不考虑循环基准测试结束时性能略有下降的情况，我们测试设备中安装的美光 512GB SSD 总体性能相当不错。由于只有一个 M.2 插槽，如果容量过于紧张，就必须更换现有硬盘。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGNCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6662 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3661 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
465 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
499.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2986 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
63.35 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
160.2 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGNSequential Read:
2599.07MB/s
Sequential Write:
1435.25MB/s
4K Read:
56.32MB/s
4K Write:
195.36MB/s
4K-64 Read:
711.41MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2887.87MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.12ms
Access Time Write:
0.019ms
Score Read:
1028Points
Score Write:
3227Points
Score Total:
4738Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGNDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6675MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
3654MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3029MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
3551MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
962MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
429MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
64MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
162.5MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
6521MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
88.3 pt Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
68.1 pt Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
63.1 pt Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
61.9 pt Average of class Office
59.4 pt MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
56.7 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
41 pt DiskSpd
seq readAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4315 (4249.57min - 4315.1max) MB/s +42%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
3191 (3164.39min - 3191.45max) MB/s +5%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (2808 - 3336, n=5)
3049 MB/s +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
3029 (3001.94min - 3028.52max) MB/s Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=81, last 2 years)
2897 MB/s -4%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2685 (2673.14min - 2685.4max) MB/s -11%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2381 (2369.66min - 2380.54max) MB/s -21% seq writeAsus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
3551 (3413.42min - 3550.9max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (2407 - 3702, n=5)
3273 MB/s -8%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
3259 (2970.55min - 3258.99max) MB/s -8%Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=81, last 2 years)
2850 MB/s -20%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2369 (2322.56min - 2368.86max) MB/s -33%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2320 (2187.12min - 2319.66max) MB/s -35%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1505 (1276.71min - 1504.84max) MB/s -58% seq q8 t1 readAverage Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (6675 - 6759, n=5)
6729 MB/s +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
6675 (5454.49min - 6674.53max) MB/s Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6418 (5867.84min - 6417.66max) MB/s -4%Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=81, last 2 years)
5265 MB/s -21%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
5035 (4487.49min - 5035.47max) MB/s -25%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3618 (3185.57min - 3617.59max) MB/s -46%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2723 (2395.19min - 2722.52max) MB/s -59% seq q8 t1 writeAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4927 (1087.79min - 4927.05max) MB/s +35%Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=81, last 2 years)
3972 MB/s +9%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (3654 - 3706, n=5)
3682 MB/s +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
3654 (3521.54min - 3653.84max) MB/s MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
3513 (3437.28min - 3513.15max) MB/s -4%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2939 (2905.25min - 2938.94max) MB/s -20%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2492 (2474.85min - 2491.89max) MB/s -32% 4k q1 t1 readSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
74.4 (66.67min - 74.35max) MB/s +16%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
64 (60.77min - 64max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (51.3 - 70, n=5)
62.6 MB/s -2%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
60.7 (60.49min - 60.66max) MB/s -5%Average of class Office (5.55 - 93.1, n=81, last 2 years)
57.6 MB/s -10%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
55.9 (55.19min - 55.86max) MB/s -13%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
52.5 (51.53min - 52.46max) MB/s -18% 4k q1 t1 writeAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
279 (266.75min - 279.17max) MB/s +72%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
164.8 (150.61min - 164.77max) MB/s +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
162.5 (151.95min - 162.47max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (107 - 222, n=5)
156.4 MB/s -4%Average of class Office (1.23 - 309, n=81, last 2 years)
151.2 MB/s -7%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
144.3 (128.92min - 144.27max) MB/s -11%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
136.5 (133.54min - 136.47max) MB/s -16% 4k q32 t16 readAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2923 (2892.49min - 2922.92max) MB/s +204%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1822 (1812.95min - 1821.77max) MB/s +89%Average of class Office (7.49 - 3806, n=81, last 2 years)
1225 MB/s +27%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (567 - 2251, n=5)
1160 MB/s +21%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
962 (945.62min - 961.5max) MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
859 (846.09min - 858.76max) MB/s -11%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
529 (509.41min - 528.85max) MB/s -45% 4k q32 t16 writeSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1544 (1519.93min - 1543.59max) MB/s +260%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1380 (1115.15min - 1380.3max) MB/s +222%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (328 - 2611, n=5)
892 MB/s +108%Average of class Office (1.5 - 3337, n=81, last 2 years)
828 MB/s +93%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
429 (403.94min - 429.32max) MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
384 (367.4min - 383.87max) MB/s -10%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
328 (306.9min - 328.4max) MB/s -24%AS SSD
Score TotalAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
7463 Points +58%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
4738 Points Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (2185 - 7172, n=5)
4446 Points -6%Average of class Office (799 - 8001, n=78, last 2 years)
4212 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3706 Points -22%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
3137 Points -34%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2449 Points -48% Score ReadAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2901 Points +182%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (1028 - 2758, n=5)
1489 Points +45%Average of class Office (383 - 3256, n=78, last 2 years)
1458 Points +42%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1426 Points +39%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1151 Points +12%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
1028 Points MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
951 Points -7% Score WriteAsus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
3227 Points Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
3132 Points -3%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (616 - 3227, n=5)
2301 Points -29%Average of class Office (247 - 3808, n=78, last 2 years)
2067 Points -36%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
1772 Points -45%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1579 Points -51%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
738 Points -77% Seq ReadAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
5796.32 MB/s +123%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (2599 - 5391, n=5)
4490 MB/s +73%Average of class Office (925 - 5796, n=78, last 2 years)
3996 MB/s +54%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
3976 MB/s +53%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3087 MB/s +19%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
2599.07 MB/s HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2597 MB/s 0% Seq WriteAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4720.45 MB/s +229%Average of class Office (294 - 5207, n=78, last 2 years)
2592 MB/s +81%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2211 MB/s +54%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
2159 MB/s +50%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (1435 - 3510, n=5)
2081 MB/s +45%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1738.71 MB/s +21%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
1435.25 MB/s 4K ReadAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
66.45 MB/s +18%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (53.2 - 88.5, n=5)
64.6 MB/s +15%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
61.1 MB/s +8%Average of class Office (18 - 88.2, n=78, last 2 years)
57.1 MB/s +1%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
56.32 MB/s MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
55.8 MB/s -1%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
52.79 MB/s -6% 4K WriteAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
230.09 MB/s +18%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
195.36 MB/s MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
184.1 MB/s -6%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (49 - 245, n=5)
180.3 MB/s -8%Average of class Office (28.2 - 245, n=78, last 2 years)
164.6 MB/s -16%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
156.53 MB/s -20%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
149.5 MB/s -23% 4K-64 ReadAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2255.03 MB/s +217%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1057 MB/s +49%Average of class Office (272 - 2643, n=78, last 2 years)
1001 MB/s +41%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (512 - 2130, n=5)
975 MB/s +37%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
838.9 MB/s +18%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
711.41 MB/s MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
498 MB/s -30% 4K-64 WriteAsus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
2887.87 MB/s Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2430.22 MB/s -16%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (356 - 2888, n=5)
1912 MB/s -34%Average of class Office (183.4 - 3370, n=78, last 2 years)
1644 MB/s -43%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
1372 MB/s -52%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1209 MB/s -58%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
407.67 MB/s -86% Access Time ReadAsus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
0.12 ms * HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
0.109 ms * +9%Average of class Office (0.025 - 0.302, n=77, last 2 years)
0.08104 ms * +32%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
0.061 ms * +49%Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (0.024 - 0.12, n=5)
0.0568 ms * +53%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * +56%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.038 ms * +68% Access Time WriteHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrKIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
0.078 ms * -311%Average of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=78, last 2 years)
0.07028 ms * -270%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840USK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -179%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.031 ms * -63%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
0.022 ms * -16%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAMicron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
0.019 ms * Average Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN (0.016 - 0.021, n=5)
0.0184 ms * +3%* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6521 (5359.08-6664.87) HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2951 (2827.17-3293.07) Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N: Ø4968 (3485.83-6480.79) MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5045 (4214.02-5067.07) Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3611 (3188.22-3621.57)
图形卡在性能方面，Radeon 780M Radeon 780M的性能相对令人失望。VivoBook 18 的 iGPU 计算速度比我们迄今测定的平均速度慢 30%--无论是在合成基准测试中还是在游戏时。三星 三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360's Arc Graphics 130V和 微星 Prestige A16's Radeon 880M明显更快。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M
100 pt Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 -1! Intel Arc Graphics 130V
83 pt Average AMD Radeon 780M
80.2 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M
77.7 pt Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U -1! AMD Radeon 780M
73.1 pt Average of class Office
55.4 pt Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M
51.2 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M
15428 Points +85%Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14312, n=69)
12421 Points +49%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M
12413 Points +49%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Radeon 780M
11636 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Arc Graphics 130V
9610 Points +15%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M
8326 Points Average of class Office (1468 - 16418, n=76, last 2 years)
7856 Points -6%3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M
57533 Points +94%Average AMD Radeon 780M (27771 - 54549, n=40)
46321 Points +56%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M
44702 Points +51%Average of class Office (8594 - 55338, n=47, last 2 years)
31392 Points +6%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M
29695 Points 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M
9462 Points +93%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Arc Graphics 130V
8497 Points +73%Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8904, n=71)
7720 Points +58%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M
7357 Points +50%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Radeon 780M
7156 Points +46%Average of class Office (736 - 10476, n=78, last 2 years)
5568 Points +14%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M
4898 Points 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M
3464 Points +111%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3352 Points +104%Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=71)
2702 Points +64%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M
2591 Points +58%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Radeon 780M
2363 Points +44%Average of class Office (322 - 4415, n=75, last 2 years)
1984 Points +21%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M
1644 Points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
30503 points3DMark 11 Performance
8127 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
159875 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26552 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
4496 points3DMark Time Spy Score
1875 pointsHelp... in comparison3DMark 11 in comparisonHP Stream 7 5700ng (min)
Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)183 ...Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs8027 R7 5700G, Vega 88050Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs8095Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA
R7 260, Radeon 780M8127Chuwi Aubox, R7 8745HS R7 8745HS, Radeon 780M8136Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs8141Gigabyte P25X v2 4810MQ, GeForce GTX 880M8234 ...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max)
R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 509082642
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=80, last 2 years)
651 Seconds * -102%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Arc Graphics 130V, Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
561 Seconds * -74%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
460 Seconds * -43%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
405 Seconds * -26%Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=69)
370 Seconds * -15%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
334 Seconds * -4%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 260
322 Seconds * * ... smaller is better
游戏性能虽然 VivoBook 18 中的 Radeon 780M 仍能处理《GTA V》等较老的游戏，但在现代游戏中的表现却相当黯淡。在我们测试的大约 10 款 2023 年后发布的游戏中，只有 文明 7在低细节的情况下也能流畅运行。
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
93.7 pt Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
87.9 pt Average AMD Radeon 780M
84.4 pt HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -1! Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS
78.8 pt Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U -2! Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
73.7 pt Average of class Office
63.2 pt Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
54.4 pt Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
25.8 (21.5min) fps +90%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
25.1 (20.6min) fps +85%Average AMD Radeon 780M (11.5 - 26.3, n=47)
20.9 fps +54%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
19.1 (9.74min) fps +40%Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=54, last 2 years)
15.4 fps +13%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
13.6 (11min) fps Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
27 fps +90%Average AMD Radeon 780M (12.8 - 29.6, n=40)
23.3 fps +64%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
22.2 fps +56%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
21.3 fps +50%Average of class Office (6.83 - 31.6, n=43, last 2 years)
17.3 fps +22%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
14.2 (11.6min, 11.6P0.1, 11.9P1) fps GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
31.2 (2.11min, 21.7P1) fps +129%Average AMD Radeon 780M (12.2 - 29.1, n=64)
24.6 fps +81%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
23.9 (7.15min, 18.9P1) fps +76%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U
21 (3.16min, 14.5P1) fps +54%Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=71, last 2 years)
15.5 fps +14%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
13.6 (1.536min, 9.43P1) fps Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
29.2 fps +79%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
28.7 fps +76%Average AMD Radeon 780M (14.6 - 30.8, n=72)
26 fps +60%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
25.2 fps +55%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U
21.2 fps +30%Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=77, last 2 years)
19.1 fps +17%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
16.3 fps Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
50.6 (21.7min, 26.6P1) fps +92%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
49.9 (15.3min, 20.3P1) fps +89%Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.5 - 53.4, n=58)
45 fps +70%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
42.2 (7.1min, 9.18P1) fps +60%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U
41.3 (7.5min, 9.37P1) fps +56%Average of class Office (12.8 - 61.7, n=60, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +24%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
26.4 (15min, 17.1P1) fps Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
78.1 (52.8min) fps +127%Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.8 - 91.2, n=73)
71.6 fps +108%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
65.4 (54.7min) fps +90%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U
61.4 (52min) fps +78%Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=83, last 2 years)
54.1 fps +57%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
45.9 (33.4min) fps +33%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
34.4 (26.9min) fps X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
44.2 fps +26%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
35.2 fps Average AMD Radeon 780M (24.5 - 41.5, n=73)
33.2 fps -6%Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=75, last 2 years)
30.6 fps -13%Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840URadeon 780M, R7 7840U
30.3 fps -14%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
27.9 fps -21%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
27.7 fps -21%
lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)
104.4
94.2
34.4
13.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
125.3
91.1
36.5
34.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
44.1
22
16.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
57
40.7
35.2
Strange Brigade (2018)
88
34.9
30.2
26.4
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
23.6
19
15
14.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
23.9
19.6
15.1
13.6
Space Marine 2 (2024)
14
12.5
10.5
Until Dawn (2024)
27.4
18.4
10.8
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)
31
28
20
Stalker 2 (2024)
12.3
11.3
9.31
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)
12.7
0 ()
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025)
18
15.4
13.4
Civilization 7 (2025)
66.7
26.6
13.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
48 (40.3min) fps +101%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
41.6 (33.8min) fps +74%Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.9 - 52.1, n=55)
39.7 fps +66%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
35.5 (19.3min) fps +49%Average of class Office (4.35 - 50.5, n=66, last 2 years)
24.8 fps +4%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
23.9 (20min) fps 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
38.1 (33min) fps +94%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
31.3 (26min) fps +60%Average AMD Radeon 780M (16.3 - 37.5, n=50)
30.5 fps +56%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
27.8 (15.3min) fps +42%Average of class Office (3.33 - 39.6, n=57, last 2 years)
21 fps +7%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
19.6 (17min) fps 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365
30.1 (25.4min) fps +99%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V
27.8 (23min) fps +84%Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.6, n=51)
24.3 fps +61%HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrRadeon 780M, R7 8840HS
22.1 (11min) fps +46%Average of class Office (5.71 - 33.4, n=59, last 2 years)
17.3 fps +15%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HARadeon 780M, R7 260
15.1 (13min) fps
正如我们的赛博朋克测试所显示的那样，至少它的帧速率长期保持稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA R7 260, Radeon 780M: Ø13 (12.1-13.2) MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M: Ø22.4 (21.4-24.5) Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V: Ø21.7 (20-22.6)
排放量噪音排放如前所述，VivoBook 18 在性能模式下声音非常大，在我们的测试中超过了所有竞争设备。我们在负载状态下测得的 50-53 dB（A）的噪音非常大，这就是为什么我们建议在正常使用时使用标准模式（约 40 dB）--反正几乎不耗电。在空闲模式下，风扇很少静止不动，通常以 27-29 分贝（A）的相当低的水平运行。
Noise Level
Idle
27 / 28 / 29 dB(A)Load
52 / 53 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAR7 260, Radeon 780MHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780MAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UR7 7840U, Radeon 780MMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880MSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130VNoise22%13%16%20%off / environment * (dB)2522.9 8%23.4 6%23 8%23.6 6%Idle Minimum * (dB)2723 15%24.1 11%23 15%23.6 13%Idle Average * (dB)2823 18%24.3 13%23 18%23.6 16%Idle Maximum * (dB)2923 21%28 3%25.02 14%23.6 19%Load Average * (dB)5223.8 54%41 21%41.88 19%29.4 43%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)5039.79 20%40.6 19%Load Maximum * (dB)5343.8 17%40.9 23%41.88 21%40.6 23%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)43.840.9* ... smaller is better
温度在温度方面，这款 18 英寸设备没有带来任何惊喜。机箱顶部的最高温度为 47 °C，底部的最高温度为 45 °C，这都是可以接受的，尤其是在空闲状态下（低于 30 °C）仍能保持良好的低温。
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
47 °C46 °C37 °C 47 °C45 °C29 °C 33 °C29 °C26 °C
Maximum: 47 °CAverage: 37.7 °C
40 °C45 °C44 °C27 °C43 °C42 °C25 °C26 °C28 °C
Maximum: 45 °CAverage: 35.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
26 °C26 °C24 °C 27 °C26 °C23 °C 23 °C23 °C23 °C
Maximum: 27 °CAverage: 24.6 °C
24 °C25 °C24 °C23 °C25 °C25 °C23 °C23 °C23 °C
Maximum: 25 °CAverage: 23.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 27 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
46 °C44 °C35 °C 45 °C45 °C30 °C 32 °C29 °C26 °C
Maximum: 46 °CAverage: 36.9 °C
39 °C43 °C43 °C28 °C42 °C40 °C25 °C26 °C28 °C
Maximum: 43 °CAverage: 34.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 51 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAR7 260, Radeon 780MHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780MAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UR7 7840U, Radeon 780MMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880MSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130VHeat-2%-8%-6%8%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)4742.6 9%41.6 11%52 -11%40.9 13%Maximum Bottom * (°C)4547.8 -6%46.6 -4%44 2%45.1 -0%Idle Upper Side * (°C)2727.4 -1%30.4 -13%28 -4%23.8 12%Idle Bottom * (°C)2527.8 -11%31 -24%28 -12%23.5 6%* ... smaller is better
压力测试在使用 Furmark 和 Prime 95 工具进行的压力测试中，Ryzen 7 260 的温度稳定在 70°C 左右。
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95发言人它的音质略好于笔记本电脑的平均水平，不过还是缺少一些低音。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 53% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理耗电量虽然这不是 HS 或 U-CPU，但笔记本电脑在闲置模式下的功耗还是很低的。事实证明，4.4 瓦的平均功耗是整个测试领域的最佳值。然而，在负载情况下，VivoBook 18 的功耗超过了 60 瓦，因此附带的 65 瓦电源被用到了极限。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.5 / 0.8 WattIdle 3.6 / 4.4 / 9 Watt
Load
64 / 69 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAR7 260, Radeon 780MHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780MAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UR7 7840U, Radeon 780MMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880MSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130VAverage of class Office Power Consumption-23%-56%-53%6%-10%Idle Minimum * (Watt)3.65 -39%7.1 -97%6.9 -92%5.3 -47%4.55 ?(1.5 - 13.8, n=85, last 2 years) -26%Idle Average * (Watt)4.46.2 -41%10.1 -130%12 -173%6.7 -52%7.42 ?(3 - 14.9, n=85, last 2 years) -69%Idle Maximum * (Watt)914.7 -63%18.6 -107%12.5 -39%7.3 19%8.84 ?(4.4 - 18.6, n=85, last 2 years) 2%Load Average * (Watt)6449.9 22%45.3 29%79.8 -25%37.6 41%41.6 ?(6.92 - 77.9, n=73, last 2 years) 35%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)6874.5 -10%42.8 37%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)6862.5 8%44.6 34%Load Maximum * (Watt)6965 6%52.9 23%96 -39%64.1 7%61.8 ?(11.1 - 107, n=85, last 2 years) 10%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)54.539.5* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.8 (60-62.3) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.35 (3.61-9.01) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø68 (66.4-68.6)
Power consumption with external monitor
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø68.3 (65.2-68.7) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.9 (60.4-68.7) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø64.3 (62.9-65.4) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.06 (2.99-5.9) Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø68 (67.3-68.5)
运行时间70 瓦时电池的续航时间绝对令人印象深刻。在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的网页浏览测试中，笔记本电脑的续航时间达到了 11 小时。在对比设备中，只有微星 Prestige A16 略胜一筹。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 03min
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAR7 260, Radeon 780M, 70 WhHP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 WhAcer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UR7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 WhMSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 WhSamsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 WhAverage of class Office Battery Runtime-31%-50%3%-3%5%WiFi v1.3 (h)11.17.7 -31%5.6 -50%11.4 3%10.8 -3%11.7 ?(3.83 - 31.5, n=86, last 2 years) 5%Reader / Idle (h)15.622.2 ?(15.7 - 38.3, n=11, last 2 years)Load (h)1.92.12.11.881 ?(0.933 - 3.63, n=39, last 2 years)H.264 (h)10.219.714.1 ?(6.83 - 25, n=16, last 2 years)
Notebookcheck 总评分VivoBook 18 M1807HA 是目前唯一一款售价低于 1000 美元的 18 英寸笔记本电脑，这使它在众多产品中脱颖而出。然而，我们的测试表明，华硕本可以在这里和那里再下点功夫，例如在外壳质量、连接性、内部构造（关键词：升级）和散热系统方面。
Back to the verdict
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA
- 03/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Chassis71 / 98 → 73%
Keyboard77%
Pointing Device81%
Connectivity56 / 80 → 70%
Weight59 / 20-75 → 71%
Battery89%
Display79%
Games Performance33 / 75 → 44%
Application Performance84 / 92 → 91%
AI Performance88%
Temperature88%
Noise70%
Audio73%
Camera36 / 75 → 48%
Average58%
77%
Office - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use81.6%Repairability50%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 34%
Possible alternatives compared
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.77.2%Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HAAMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,099.99ASUS Vivobook 18 Laptop, 18�...2. $7.59Keyboard Cover Skin for ASUS...3. $7.592PCS Keyboard Cover for ASUS...List Price: 800 EUR2.6 kg20 mm18.40"1920x1200123 PPIIPS
2.87.2% v7 (old)HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nrAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $145.99LCDOLED Replacement for HP E...2. $24.95mCover Case ONLY Compatible ...3. $5.99Keyboard Skin Cover Compatib...List Price: 1300 USD1.8 kg18.3 mm16.00"2880x1800212 PPIOLED
3.88.6% v7 (old)Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: $1,029.99List Price: 1300 USD1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIOLED
4.81.9%MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDList Price: 1599 Euro2 kg17.35 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
5.85.9%Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: $1,399.99List Price: 1799€1.7 kg12.8 mm16.00"2880x1800212 PPIOLED
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 617304 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!